<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WCAG 2.0 accessibility guidelines for content writers in 10 easy lessons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contented.com/contented/2010/wcag-2-0-accessibility-guidelines-for-content-writers-in-10-easy-lessons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contented.com/contented/2010/wcag-2-0-accessibility-guidelines-for-content-writers-in-10-easy-lessons/</link>
	<description>Content that makes people happy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>http://contented.com/contented/2010/wcag-2-0-accessibility-guidelines-for-content-writers-in-10-easy-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contented.com/contented/?p=1228#comment-571</guid>
		<description>Oh, yeah. It&#039;s just that... &quot;Plain English&quot;, it&#039;s not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yeah. It&#8217;s just that&#8230; &#8220;Plain English&#8221;, it&#8217;s not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachel</title>
		<link>http://contented.com/contented/2010/wcag-2-0-accessibility-guidelines-for-content-writers-in-10-easy-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contented.com/contented/?p=1228#comment-570</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;re more focused on the result for users, and less on the specific technology (which is a moving target anyway).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re more focused on the result for users, and less on the specific technology (which is a moving target anyway).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>http://contented.com/contented/2010/wcag-2-0-accessibility-guidelines-for-content-writers-in-10-easy-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contented.com/contented/?p=1228#comment-569</guid>
		<description>I look forward to these series of posts. It is an important topic.

I&#039;m not too sure, however, that WCAG 2.0 guidelines are easier to understand than WCAG 1.0. Not gonna argue the toss though ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look forward to these series of posts. It is an important topic.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not too sure, however, that WCAG 2.0 guidelines are easier to understand than WCAG 1.0. Not gonna argue the toss though <img src='http://contented.com/contented/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
