Diploma in Web Content
$230.00
$230.00
This exceptional training programme clarifies the complex web standards that content authors need to know. Cut through the jargon and stop the gush of inaccessible content with just 10 hours of practical online training. Accredited CPD qualification.
The Diploma in Accessible Content is designed for government agencies whose websites must comply with WCAG 2.2 or Section 508. 10 hours of continuing professional development (CPD), equivalent to a 2-day live training programme. No more inaccessible PDFs!
Audience: For IT professionals, technical writers, web developers, web teams, intranet teams, content owners, content managers and content strategists. Also for subject experts, copywriters, and general staff who write as part of their job.
Prerequisite: None, apart from a computer with internet access. No IT or accessibility knowledge required.
Qualification: Professional development diploma in accessible content. 10 hours CPD credit.
Time and place: Distance learning: Start any time. Study online: your place, your pace.
Duration: 10 hours study, equivalent to a 2-day workshop. You can access the writing courses for 180 days from the time you first log in.
Assessment: 10 online elearning tests.
Authors: Alice Hearnshaw and Rachel McAlpine, respected specialists in digital content, are the course authors. Rachel has taught in Australia, Japan, China, New Zealand and Singapore.
Have you already done our Diploma in Web Content?
If so, just do the Certificate in Accessible Content, and then you'll qualify for the Diploma in Accessible Content.
The training has some great entry level advice for folks starting these types of roles. I think that with a bit of a graphics and navigation update along with some updated examples (perhaps even an option to branch into a few different spaces that the learner can choose) would be great. You could have a minimum number but also give an option to look at a few more for those that want some additional help. It would be good to have a 'pre' and 'post' version of self-check so that learners can see growth across the course. The content was good, and info was good but a couple updates would make it amazing. Even with this feedback, have recommended the course to others. Again, constructive criticism rather than negative review.