E-government as a word has been around since about 1996, but there's no universal agreement about what it means. That's not surprising, because concepts of e-government vary considerably according to each countryâ€™s political system and internet coverage, and they are changing as fast as you can blink.
The possibilities have multiplied with Web 2.0 technology, and the social and political reverberations are massive. At the very least, e-government includes putting most government-to-citizen services online, integrating government services, and improving efficiency and transparency. Some countriesâ€™ visions for e-government emphasise citizen involvement and satisfaction, others the potential of e-government to enable surveillance of corrupt public servants. Some countries see e-governance as a sub-set or consequence of IT development, the driving force behind a new prosperity.
In the west it's all about us us us. But Beijing city has different needs and therefore a different plan:
The vision of E-Government is to reduce the administrative hierarchies, reform the modes of government affairs, optimize the government business process, clarify the administrative work, improve the quality of government service and management, enhance the collaboration of the internal departments and the interactions between the government and the public, and finally to construct an honest, diligent, transparent and efficient government using technology as a means to the end.
I realise this quote is a few years old, and it's about a city, not the nation. What is China's vision for e-government now?
Intranet surveys are twice as interesting as web site surveys, because intranets are hidden from outsiders. Web sites are public, intranets are private.
The 2006 Global Intranet Survey Report from Jane McConnell is especially welcome for that reason. (The report came out in October, but hey, Contented is only a couple of weeks old.) It surveys intranets of 101 organisations, mainly international, ranging from under 5000 to over 100,000 employees.
Here's a quote: 'The intranet or what some call "the organisational lifeline" is at a key turning point for the majority of organisations.'
The report is illustrated with heaps of excellent graphs and pie-charts, and findings are clearly summarised. I'll mention a few that directly affect content writers.
Unaware of just how essential the intranet is for everyday business, senior management seems to be out of whack with most employees. This distorted perception inevitably cramps budgets, slows decision making, and tunnels vision.
The old intranet concentrated on communicating content one way, from the top down. The old intranet was somewhat static, and lacked integrated applications.
But now intranet 2.0 is upon us. The most forward-thinking organisations actively promote the use of wikis and blogs within the intranet. Smart organisations increasingly use the intranet as a channel for collaboration and two-way discussion of new ideas, new projects, and new content on the intranet.
Also relevant to content writers is the trend towards feeds to PDAs and other hand-held devices. All online content should be concise: when pumped to Palms and Blackberries and mobile phones, that content must be minimalist in the extreme.
*Help me out here please. Mahogany? Corporate?
Interested in how Web 2.0 services persuade people and change their behaviours? Then this message from the renowned BJ Fogg, Director of the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab is for you.
'My Stanford students have created short videos (averaging 2 minutes) that show how Web 2.0 services persuade people and change their behaviors. The videos are interesting -- and sometimes funny. I'm inviting you to help evaluate some of these videos before December 4th. You can rate one video or twenty. The choice is yours.
'The videos with the highest rating will be featured in the Captology Film Festival on December 7th at Stanford. You're invited to join us at that event. For more info, see http://tinyurl.com/yap7fe .
'To watch and rate the videos, go to:
Mark Ottaway, Managing Director, Nielsen//NetRatings, New Zealand, hammered this point during his presentation on Internet metrics and trends at the TUANZ Business Internet Conference (21 November 2006).
In fact he said it three times. I wonder why? Could it be something people cannot and will not hear?
'Don't put the Web in a glasshouse. The Web is not special. It's not new: it has been around since 1989. Don't hand web sites over to the IT department and wash your hands of them. Web sites are an important, integral, normal part of business.'
That's what we have been saying about web content for quite some time...
'Don't put web content in a glasshouse.'
Business writing is web writing. Business writing is web writing. Did you hear that? I'd better say it again. Business writing is web writing. Your business depends on your ability to communicate online.
What is the purpose of books? Not the same in every culture. A display of thirteen centuries of illustrated books in Japan shows books dedicated to catching the essence of a moment - a second - or even a nanosecond. One scroll illustrates a single day's journey. An all-night party by Hokusai produced 364 sketches. The books themselves were perceived as ephemera.
"When the evanescent is carefully contemplated, something timeless is revealed," says Edward Rothstein (New York Times). The exhibition is in the New York Public Library until 4 February 2007.
Ehon: The Artist and the book in Japan
Were these beautiful, strange, startling books the equivalent of a newspaper? Is online journalism the ultimate in ephemera, or a museum of fossils?